Of Devious Lecturers
Sep. 30th, 2007 12:30 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
highlyeccentricDavid Juste wanted to know why he doesn't get a mention on my blog, when Melanie, Dan and JP have all been extensively discussed. Being 1200 words into an essay for David at the moment, and having spent the last week trying to write the damned thing, I feel now is the appropriate time to inform the world of his qualities.
David Justse is a devious, devious man.*
Only some kind of twisted mind would, when faced with my publicly declared intention to write a shoddy essay for his subject and save my energies for things more important, resolve to improve my studently endeavours by threatening to consult a teacher whose standards he knows I will turn myself inside out in an attempt to meet. And the thing is, he has a perfectly legitimate reason to do so: he's a high medieval science scholar, and I've declared that I'm removing myself from his time and territory by writing my essays for "medieval cosmology" on Anglo-Saxon topics. So it's perfectly normal for him to ask an Anglo-Saxonist to read over it for him and tell him if i'm off my nut.
Except that the look of sheer glee on his face when he announced his intention to do so suggests to me that he knew exactly what effect that would have on my essay.
In fact, the essay has pulled up its socks so far that i'm now going to specifically ask Melanie to read over it, regardless of David's eventual decision. I've been putting so much time into sorting my footnotes out, i feel someone ought to tell me how I'm going, and I only know one teacher who is persnickety enough to care about comma placement or how to construct a footnote in which you've quoted both an edition and a separate translation of a text.
So, in conclusion: a good teacher inspires their students to raise their standards, i think we are all agreed on this. What can we say of a teacher who employs devious means such as these?
(of course, the other question is: was i going to be capable of writing a sloppy essay on an anglo-saxon topic anyway?)
*disclaimer: I don't normally insult academics in public posts. Rest assured David is a special case, and he will probably take it as a compliment anyway. It is a compliment, actually.
David Justse is a devious, devious man.*
Only some kind of twisted mind would, when faced with my publicly declared intention to write a shoddy essay for his subject and save my energies for things more important, resolve to improve my studently endeavours by threatening to consult a teacher whose standards he knows I will turn myself inside out in an attempt to meet. And the thing is, he has a perfectly legitimate reason to do so: he's a high medieval science scholar, and I've declared that I'm removing myself from his time and territory by writing my essays for "medieval cosmology" on Anglo-Saxon topics. So it's perfectly normal for him to ask an Anglo-Saxonist to read over it for him and tell him if i'm off my nut.
Except that the look of sheer glee on his face when he announced his intention to do so suggests to me that he knew exactly what effect that would have on my essay.
In fact, the essay has pulled up its socks so far that i'm now going to specifically ask Melanie to read over it, regardless of David's eventual decision. I've been putting so much time into sorting my footnotes out, i feel someone ought to tell me how I'm going, and I only know one teacher who is persnickety enough to care about comma placement or how to construct a footnote in which you've quoted both an edition and a separate translation of a text.
So, in conclusion: a good teacher inspires their students to raise their standards, i think we are all agreed on this. What can we say of a teacher who employs devious means such as these?
(of course, the other question is: was i going to be capable of writing a sloppy essay on an anglo-saxon topic anyway?)
*disclaimer: I don't normally insult academics in public posts. Rest assured David is a special case, and he will probably take it as a compliment anyway. It is a compliment, actually.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 01:49 pm (UTC)i am brain dead but malleable :P
aside from having to go to the library at some point, i am easy.
is Fisher open before 1, though?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 01:53 pm (UTC)I don't know. I haven't ever been in on Public Holidays. Only weekdays and Sundays. I'll check though.
Ok, so what about we plan on meeting at 2 outside Fisher, and if things change, we make sure we both have our mobiles where we can find and feel them? :P
Is an hour enough time for you in the library to get done what you need?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 01:56 pm (UTC)good plan.
i get up in the morning, do my translations, have lunch, go to fisher, meet you, have hot chocolate or something, come home, write essay.
PLAN
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:03 pm (UTC)I GET TO PLAY WITH RANDOM DAVID!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:09 pm (UTC)MISS AMY IS GOING TO PLAY WITH ME!
... WHY DOES THAT SOUND SO DIRTY IN MY HEAD?!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:15 pm (UTC)you know me so well, Miss Amy.
perhaps... too well?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:18 pm (UTC)i mean, take B for example. he just had to take one look at your LJ icon and decided you were a candidate for dirty minded banter.
deep knowledge of your psyche is not required. :P
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:28 pm (UTC)*snigger*
The only other icon of mine that's been mentioned (to my knowledge and recollection) was the "Never Meant To" icon, which was one of our first Comment Topics. Not particularly dirty though... more of a sad apology.
I guess I have to ask now, otherwise the question will eat through my brain like acid. Sweet, sweet acid-linked-to-things-dirty.