Of Devious Lecturers
Sep. 30th, 2007 12:30 amDavid Juste wanted to know why he doesn't get a mention on my blog, when Melanie, Dan and JP have all been extensively discussed. Being 1200 words into an essay for David at the moment, and having spent the last week trying to write the damned thing, I feel now is the appropriate time to inform the world of his qualities.
David Justse is a devious, devious man.*
Only some kind of twisted mind would, when faced with my publicly declared intention to write a shoddy essay for his subject and save my energies for things more important, resolve to improve my studently endeavours by threatening to consult a teacher whose standards he knows I will turn myself inside out in an attempt to meet. And the thing is, he has a perfectly legitimate reason to do so: he's a high medieval science scholar, and I've declared that I'm removing myself from his time and territory by writing my essays for "medieval cosmology" on Anglo-Saxon topics. So it's perfectly normal for him to ask an Anglo-Saxonist to read over it for him and tell him if i'm off my nut.
Except that the look of sheer glee on his face when he announced his intention to do so suggests to me that he knew exactly what effect that would have on my essay.
In fact, the essay has pulled up its socks so far that i'm now going to specifically ask Melanie to read over it, regardless of David's eventual decision. I've been putting so much time into sorting my footnotes out, i feel someone ought to tell me how I'm going, and I only know one teacher who is persnickety enough to care about comma placement or how to construct a footnote in which you've quoted both an edition and a separate translation of a text.
So, in conclusion: a good teacher inspires their students to raise their standards, i think we are all agreed on this. What can we say of a teacher who employs devious means such as these?
(of course, the other question is: was i going to be capable of writing a sloppy essay on an anglo-saxon topic anyway?)
*disclaimer: I don't normally insult academics in public posts. Rest assured David is a special case, and he will probably take it as a compliment anyway. It is a compliment, actually.
David Justse is a devious, devious man.*
Only some kind of twisted mind would, when faced with my publicly declared intention to write a shoddy essay for his subject and save my energies for things more important, resolve to improve my studently endeavours by threatening to consult a teacher whose standards he knows I will turn myself inside out in an attempt to meet. And the thing is, he has a perfectly legitimate reason to do so: he's a high medieval science scholar, and I've declared that I'm removing myself from his time and territory by writing my essays for "medieval cosmology" on Anglo-Saxon topics. So it's perfectly normal for him to ask an Anglo-Saxonist to read over it for him and tell him if i'm off my nut.
Except that the look of sheer glee on his face when he announced his intention to do so suggests to me that he knew exactly what effect that would have on my essay.
In fact, the essay has pulled up its socks so far that i'm now going to specifically ask Melanie to read over it, regardless of David's eventual decision. I've been putting so much time into sorting my footnotes out, i feel someone ought to tell me how I'm going, and I only know one teacher who is persnickety enough to care about comma placement or how to construct a footnote in which you've quoted both an edition and a separate translation of a text.
So, in conclusion: a good teacher inspires their students to raise their standards, i think we are all agreed on this. What can we say of a teacher who employs devious means such as these?
(of course, the other question is: was i going to be capable of writing a sloppy essay on an anglo-saxon topic anyway?)
*disclaimer: I don't normally insult academics in public posts. Rest assured David is a special case, and he will probably take it as a compliment anyway. It is a compliment, actually.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-29 09:45 pm (UTC)(No.)
His expression when he declared his intention to check your essay over with Mel was...gleeful, to say the least. Heh. Heh. Heh.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-29 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 06:32 am (UTC)Feel free to restore it, if you like. :D
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 07:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 07:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 12:11 pm (UTC)Or, next time I get drunk I can be cute on your 'journal again. :P
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:34 pm (UTC)Is this true? If so, which icon?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 11:24 pm (UTC)this is me being curious
fine line
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 11:26 pm (UTC)curious away, then...
BREAKFAST TIME!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-01 12:02 am (UTC)*points to last comment on page*
memory jogging?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-01 12:08 am (UTC)*returns*
I don't think it was the icons, or anything specific. I think what our resident blonde meant was that I took 'one look at you' in a metaphorical sense. Which is certainly true enough.
You do have some neat icons.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 01:07 pm (UTC)i'd forgotten that tomorrow was a public holiday.
whaddya reckon?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 01:25 pm (UTC)haven't been completely converted to Macdom yetdon't have a Mac... yet... this means war. Or using the Uni's; whichever is cheaper.le sigh
So, I was planning on going in around 9/10ish and working until lunch, and then going on to see you (what is this? Me planning? There are so many things wrong with those words). Which would make meeting up with you at about 1 or 2 maybe. Unless I finish early, which means maybe more of a lunch date? I dunno (that's more like it :D).
Unless, of course, you were planning on taking the whole day off to work on essays and stuff, or just have plans at a certain time. That'd be completely understandable; I think the campus has, en masse, been relatively brain dead this past week. At least, most of my friends have been, and I tend to have at least nerdyish friends. I've been pretty dead, too, which is why today and a bit of yesterday were devoted to getting the foundations down on my website... and getting Peter's birthday present :P AND HAVING PANCAKE BREAKFAST XD
I'm just now wondering if the SUESS Labs will in fact be open, it being a public holiday and all... eep. They were open all holidays, and I just sort of assumed :S
Um, yeah... so whadda you think?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 01:49 pm (UTC)i am brain dead but malleable :P
aside from having to go to the library at some point, i am easy.
is Fisher open before 1, though?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 01:53 pm (UTC)I don't know. I haven't ever been in on Public Holidays. Only weekdays and Sundays. I'll check though.
Ok, so what about we plan on meeting at 2 outside Fisher, and if things change, we make sure we both have our mobiles where we can find and feel them? :P
Is an hour enough time for you in the library to get done what you need?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 01:56 pm (UTC)good plan.
i get up in the morning, do my translations, have lunch, go to fisher, meet you, have hot chocolate or something, come home, write essay.
PLAN
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:03 pm (UTC)I GET TO PLAY WITH RANDOM DAVID!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:09 pm (UTC)MISS AMY IS GOING TO PLAY WITH ME!
... WHY DOES THAT SOUND SO DIRTY IN MY HEAD?!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:15 pm (UTC)you know me so well, Miss Amy.
perhaps... too well?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:18 pm (UTC)i mean, take B for example. he just had to take one look at your LJ icon and decided you were a candidate for dirty minded banter.
deep knowledge of your psyche is not required. :P
no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 02:28 pm (UTC)*snigger*
The only other icon of mine that's been mentioned (to my knowledge and recollection) was the "Never Meant To" icon, which was one of our first Comment Topics. Not particularly dirty though... more of a sad apology.
I guess I have to ask now, otherwise the question will eat through my brain like acid. Sweet, sweet acid-linked-to-things-dirty.