highlyeccentric: Sign on Little Queen St - One Way both directions (Default)
[personal profile] highlyeccentric
Americans and persons better informed than I:

What is the "war on drugs", exactly?
Why am I seeing the occasional reference to the "war on drugs" in RaceFail posts, usually with the implication that said "war on drugs" is a specific and negative policy against the black community? Is there a particular race angle to its application, or is it something which negatively impacts low socio-economic groups, including a high percentage of the black community?

~

Next:

Is 'people of colour' really the PC term?
Is it PC anywhere outside of the States? Because it sounds racist to me, and my gut says it wouldn't go down well in Australia if you reffered to anyone as a person of colour.
Who IS considered a 'person of colour' in the States? Is an Italian-American considered a 'person of colour'? An immigrant from the Middle East? The Hispanic community?

Date: 2009-03-27 12:45 am (UTC)
ext_3638: I'm in ur history, emphasising ur wimminz (Default)
From: [identity profile] kayloulee.livejournal.com
I dunno enough about the 'war on drugs' to inform you about it, but on PoC I think I can help. It is really the PC term, and I don't know if it's used in, say, the UK but here it's not used so much, I don't think. I get the impression that 'non-white' is used here more, but I could totally be wrong. An Italian-American is not a person of colour, being white European, but people originally from the Middle East or with Middle Eastern heritage are, and so is the Hispanic community.

Date: 2009-03-27 12:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] highlyeccentric.livejournal.com
An Italian-American is not a person of colour, being white European

That's not an automatic definition - someone or a cultural shift at some point has to define what's 'white European'. I refer you to post WWII migration and the relaxation of the White Australia Policy, when someone had to DECIDE that southern and eastern Europeans could be white if they tried.

Date: 2009-03-27 02:37 am (UTC)
ext_3638: I'm in ur history, emphasising ur wimminz (Default)
From: [identity profile] kayloulee.livejournal.com
Yes, that's true, but I wasn't going so much for historical definitions as what PoC means right now. I should be able to tell you vaguely when that change was, but my high school history is failing me. I bet you though that originally the change in who was considered white in Australia had a lot to do with, as you said, post-WWII immigration (migration? emigration? I need to check dictionaries) and the Snowy River Scheme.

Date: 2009-03-27 02:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] highlyeccentric.livejournal.com
Yahuh. Anyway, i asked because it's becoming increasingly evident that the US's attitudes to race don't match up to ours. Who WE think is "white" (ick) doesn't necessarily mean the same people in the states.

Date: 2009-03-27 03:44 am (UTC)
ext_3638: I'm in ur history, emphasising ur wimminz (Default)
From: [identity profile] kayloulee.livejournal.com
I'd kind of gathered that from reading RaceFail - some Antipodeans (not sure who now) commented that some things just didn't apply/needed tweaking to be relevant and useful for people outside of the US.

Date: 2009-03-27 01:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anachronisma.livejournal.com
Usage varies, a lot, but in my experience, "people of colour" usually refers quite specifically to African-Americans. Organizations for "people of colour" usually are targeted for African-Americans/"black" people in the United States.*

The recognized races in the United States according to the Census Bureau seem to be "White" "Black or African American" "American Indian or Alaska Native" "Asian" "Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander" "Hispanic or Latino, Any Race" and "Some Other Race". Hispanics may be of any race, which really translates culturally into Black or White. (see here (http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/race/racefactcb.html)).

Italians and many people from the Middle East are definitely not "Black" or "American Indian" or "Pacific Islanders" or "Latinos". Some Middle Easterners might be classified as "Asian", others of them might be "Black" but in popular culture they're more likely to be viewed by default as White...ish. Russians and people from Eastern Europe are probably white by default even though many ethnic groups in Russia are probably closer to Asian.

Date: 2009-03-27 01:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anachronisma.livejournal.com
Random Star! Don't know where that came from. Sorry.

Date: 2009-03-27 01:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] highlyeccentric.livejournal.com
Hmm. Interesting. I hear "coloured" and think it ought to refer to any group formerly identified by colour - "red", "yellow" or "black" being the three that come to mind.

... I really don't like the idea of identifying ethnic groups by colour. It feels really really wrong.

Interesting that you'd say middle eastern groups are more likely to be viewed as "white-ish" - goes to show how different the cultural makeup of the US is to Australia's, I suppose. Here, middle eastern cultural groups tend to be the most feared / resented / considered least able to fit in / the group who most need to assimilate (rather than, say, integrate, or get along in a happy multicultural fashion).

Date: 2009-03-27 01:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anachronisma.livejournal.com
There's definitely a lot of racism targeted against middle eastern cultural groups here in the US but we don't have anything else to call them except derogatory terms, heh. For census taking purposes they are probably "white". A lot of people are stupid and mistake middle easterners for Hispanics, I have noticed.

Date: 2009-03-27 01:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] highlyeccentric.livejournal.com
wait, your census uses the term 'white'? ICK. Ick ick ick ick.

... I have no idea what our census uses. Probably 'Anglo-Australian' or 'Of British or European descent'.

Date: 2009-03-27 01:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ahsavka.livejournal.com
I think it usually says something like

white/Caucasian

Caucasian is our PC term for white when you just don't know what kind of white you are.

Date: 2009-03-27 01:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] highlyeccentric.livejournal.com
Yeah, actually, I've heard that one. That might be what's on our census?

Date: 2009-03-27 04:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anachronisma.livejournal.com
But Caucasians aren't from the Caucasus. This drives me absolutely insane.

Date: 2009-03-27 12:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ahsavka.livejournal.com
I know, it makes no sense.

We need a descriptive term for "light skinned" that's short. Light skinned basically works, except that it's relative. "White" and "black" are loaded. But what are you, if you're of significantly mixed heritage? I'm a French/Irish/Italian/Austrian/Hungarian/Romanian-American. Yowza. I think (not completely sure) you can still call me a European American, but what about my cousins, who are Irish/French/Mexican-Americans? And African-American doesn't tell us enough, because African's huge and diverse all on its own.

This topic is too big for me, I think.

Date: 2009-03-27 01:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anachronisma.livejournal.com
I hate basically all the terms on our census. Especially white but including "black/African-American" because what if you're an American of ... say Berber descent? Are you white? Are you African? What the hell are you?

Date: 2009-03-27 02:47 am (UTC)
ext_3638: I'm in ur history, emphasising ur wimminz (Default)
From: [identity profile] kayloulee.livejournal.com
I have a question. Is it true that the US census isn't allowed to ask about people's religion? I heard a while ago that it's not, which interested me because ours does - there was a kafuffle a while back, probably just after our last census (2006, I think), about moving "no religion" or the equivalent tickybox further up the list of options, because a lot of people who aren't observant or bother very much about religion just ask their parents which religion/belief system they are, which skews the statistics.

I never know what term to identify people by, because most of them are icky and have all sorts of unpleasant connotations. But then no one has any idea what I'm talking about, because they're expecting to hear the usual descriptions. PoC does sound pretty old-fashioned and ... wrong - probably the only thing going for it is that it's reasonably wide-ranging, but even that's not necessarily a good thing, because hello generalisations.

Date: 2009-03-27 04:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anachronisma.livejournal.com
EDIT: I killed my link. And reposted to the wrong place. Here you go.

According to the data available from the Census Bureau, questions of religion are not reported on. I've never filled out a census questionnaire so I don't know if they're NOT ALLOWED TO but that data isn't available to the public even if they do gather it.

I do know that for government statistical reasons when I was applying to public universities I was not obligated to fill out my race (it was option) and the question of religion was not asked for records.

The offending link: Census Bureau categories. (http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ACSSAFFPeople?_event=&geo_id=01000US&_geoContext=01000US&_street=&_county=&_cityTown=&_state=&_zip=&_lang=en&_sse=on&ActiveGeoDiv=&_useEV=&pctxt=fph&pgsl=010&_submenuId=people_0&ds_name=ACS_2007_3YR_SAFF&_ci_nbr=null&qr_name=null®=null%3Anull&_keyword=&_industry=)

Date: 2009-03-27 05:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anachronisma.livejournal.com
I will also add that when I did not fill out my race on the public forms they randomly attributed one to me (without alerting me in any way), and it is an incorrect one. They put me as Hispanic student and I am, in fact, an Anglo-Filipino-AmeriIndian-European student with a Spanish last name.

Date: 2009-03-27 04:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iremos.livejournal.com
"Coloured" is only a step up from the n-word. To say someone is "of color" is to reclaim the idea of a diverse ethnic heritage without resorting to the parlance of a very racist era.

Equally, "African-American" is fraught with all sorts of meanings. For example, Obama was criticized early on in his campaign for not being "black" enough because although his father was African, he didn't have the experience of slavery, although it could be argued that Obama in more "African-American" than most "African-Americans" who, because of their distance from their lineage, cannot pinpoint where their African heritage is located on a map.

So yes, a "person of color" is a PC term, but usually not one applied by a white person, but by members of that minority.

Date: 2009-03-27 04:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anachronisma.livejournal.com
I'm brilliant and am posting things to the wrong places. Sorry!

Date: 2009-03-27 04:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] highlyeccentric.livejournal.com
Clearly it is past your bedtime, Karimonkey.

Date: 2009-03-27 05:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anachronisma.livejournal.com
It's 1 AM! I've made a bunch of dumb mistakes because I'm nervous... I sliced my thumb open with a bread knife, sent an email without an attachment, and did Erratic Posting.

Date: 2009-03-27 05:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] highlyeccentric.livejournal.com
Nervous Karifish? I hope Karifishes aren't like goldfishes, nervous goldfishes keel over and die.

Date: 2009-03-27 05:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anachronisma.livejournal.com
I'm leaving in 6 hours for my conference and have to meet a whole bunch of strangers in approximately 15 hours and manage all by myself like a Real Grown Up (TM) when I don't have the foggiest CLUE what I'm doing or how my paper got accepted.

Date: 2009-03-27 05:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] highlyeccentric.livejournal.com
*giggles* ye'll be fine! Me and my army say so.

Date: 2009-03-27 01:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ahsavka.livejournal.com
I don't think there's agreement in the US about what terms to use.

I have never ever heard PoC used by anybody except 1) the internet and 2) old ladies trying hard to be PC. It always sounds sort of ... not good, to me. On the internet it seems to have a broader meaning, but in Virginia a Person of Color is black. Hispanic/Latino != PoC, PoC is a quaint term for a black human. I heard someone say that you can't say "black" in the USA, but ... that is what my black friends call themselves. Dunno. The newsfolk mostly say African American, which from my understanding causes problemos when referring to black Australians or English folks and such.

I have heard people arguing about what PoC really means, I have no idea. Italian-American = no, but if your skin is literally dark it seems to be okay. The exception seems to be that sometimes being Jewish makes you qualify as a PoC, but sometimes not. Highly awkward.

The War On Drugs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_drugs) (insanely long) is lame. I can't go into detail, it will take me all night, and I don't want to make myself sick.

The worst combination of things:

. racial profiling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_profiling). (note: our relevant cop/coplike-agents are mostly white, and our poor+urban folks are disproportionately nonwhite)
. no-knock warrants (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-knock_warrant), just one of the many awful things to come out of the War On Drugs. This is terrible for every American. It shames me as a citizen.

Date: 2009-03-27 01:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] highlyeccentric.livejournal.com
Thanks for the links, I'll follow them from home this weekend :)

Oh, I'm glad someone else finds the term 'people of colour' uncomfortable. The term 'white' makes me screamingly uncomfortable, too - I guess I actually paid attention in history class, every time I hear 'white' I hear 'white Australia policy', government-endorsed discrimination, jingoism, cultural conservatism, and a whole bunch of things which can generally be summed up as DO NOT WANT. And I *am* technically (and literally, being as pale as a very pale thing) white, which is supposed to mean this sort of thing doesn't bother me.

Date: 2009-03-27 01:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ahsavka.livejournal.com
I think I'm less conscious of "white", but I understand what you mean, when I think about it I don't like it much either.

The problem is that it's so loaded, but we need a word to be descriptive. She was tall, with blue eyes and brown hair and white(can we use pink? We're pink.) skin. You don't know a body's history.

(I'm actually sorry to linkdump on you like that -- but I have to go to bed!)

Date: 2009-03-27 01:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] highlyeccentric.livejournal.com
Caucasian is what gets used in police descriptions, now that I recall. Tall, brown eyes, of Caucasian appearance, of middle eastern appearance, etc.

Date: 2009-03-27 02:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phrasemuffin.livejournal.com
I don't even like "black". I know it's widely viewed as ok, but African or African-American does me just fine.

The war on drugs is just trying to get drug use and drug dealing gone bye-bye, I thought. And the assumption/fact-as-proven-by-"science" that lower class non-Anglo citizens are more likely to peddle or meddle in them than upper class Anglo citizens, with a continuum between. Then again, you have Proper Linkage now, so you'll probably be able to tell me how very wrong I am later.

Date: 2009-03-27 10:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tea-fiend.livejournal.com
Science my arse. I think that one, if there's any truth to it, can be put down to socioeconomic status. And low socioeconomic status is, surprise surprise, the reason why so many of my (young, white, working or middle class) acquaintances take and deal drugs - it's good money on the dealing side, and there's nothing else to do with one's time. Colour's got bugger all to do with it.

Date: 2009-03-27 03:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kishnevi.livejournal.com
The War on Drugs is the overall term for the government's effort to make sure that people only use government approved intoxicants and pharmaceuticals. Enforcement efforts primarily impact on those in the lower socio economic classes, and that means they disproportionately impact blacks and Hispanics. It may or may not be true that drug use is proportionately higher among the lower socio economic classes. It is definite that a very high proportion of young black men are in prison on drug related offenses--either because they use them or attempted to sell them. I don't think the War on Drug is intentionally targeting minority communities, but it certainly has that effect.

Under the banner of the War on Drugs, the government has been able to radically limit most civil liberties, and is in the process of militarizing the police. Corruption is endemic, although not yet on the scale of Mexico. The situation in Mexico is of course yet another bad consequence of the War on Drugs. What is more common is the tendency of police to abuse regular citizens for pleasure and/or profit.

I've heard the term "People of Color" used fairly often, usually with the intent of including non-whites under one term that distinguished them from whites. Whites in this context means those of European descent, and while it usually includes Jews, does not normally include anyone else of Mideastern descent. I think the intent behind the phrase is to be PC; at the very least, I've always heard it used by leftist or left-leaning sources, and never by conservative sources.

Date: 2009-03-27 04:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] areyoustrange.livejournal.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_of_color <---- actually a really good summary. The term's mostly used in the US, but it's not generally considered racist at all, and I've heard a few Australians and UK-type people using it as well.

Date: 2009-03-27 07:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] niamh-sage.livejournal.com
Highly, if you haven't already been following it, you might find the comm [livejournal.com profile] racism_101 useful for some of your questions.

Date: 2009-03-27 10:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tea-fiend.livejournal.com
So far as I know, the war on drugs (a bit of a misnomer, really, since "war" allows for the possibility of victory) is where politicians get all het up about kids smoking weed, and get the police to arrest people for possession of two pills and an eighth, in the misguided belief that this will somehow bring down Columbian crack barons and so on. I'd imagine the link with black people is the disparity between levels of perceived drug crimes across different ethnic groups, and the much higher rate of arrests and incarcerations for black people suspected or convicted of committing drug related crimes.

Case in point: my dealer got herself busted in January (right before my loan day; the timing was abysmal). Every bedroom in her house was given over to growing weed. The amount she had, she could've been looking at fifteen years. Had she been black, she probably would have gone down for it. But she's white, and played the insanity card - "I'm bipolar, I self medicate." And it worked, once the police had been convinced that, yes, you can smoke an eighth a day. Dunno where things stand at the moment, but it looks like she won't be doing time for it.

And here, no, it's not "people of colour". It's black if they're black, or Asian if they're from anywhere near India, or Middle Eastern if they're from there.

Profile

highlyeccentric: Sign on Little Queen St - One Way both directions (Default)
highlyeccentric

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 29
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 10:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios