Inform me, pls
Mar. 27th, 2009 11:00 amAmericans and persons better informed than I:
What is the "war on drugs", exactly?
Why am I seeing the occasional reference to the "war on drugs" in RaceFail posts, usually with the implication that said "war on drugs" is a specific and negative policy against the black community? Is there a particular race angle to its application, or is it something which negatively impacts low socio-economic groups, including a high percentage of the black community?
~
Next:
Is 'people of colour' really the PC term?
Is it PC anywhere outside of the States? Because it sounds racist to me, and my gut says it wouldn't go down well in Australia if you reffered to anyone as a person of colour.
Who IS considered a 'person of colour' in the States? Is an Italian-American considered a 'person of colour'? An immigrant from the Middle East? The Hispanic community?
What is the "war on drugs", exactly?
Why am I seeing the occasional reference to the "war on drugs" in RaceFail posts, usually with the implication that said "war on drugs" is a specific and negative policy against the black community? Is there a particular race angle to its application, or is it something which negatively impacts low socio-economic groups, including a high percentage of the black community?
~
Next:
Is 'people of colour' really the PC term?
Is it PC anywhere outside of the States? Because it sounds racist to me, and my gut says it wouldn't go down well in Australia if you reffered to anyone as a person of colour.
Who IS considered a 'person of colour' in the States? Is an Italian-American considered a 'person of colour'? An immigrant from the Middle East? The Hispanic community?
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 12:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 12:48 am (UTC)That's not an automatic definition - someone or a cultural shift at some point has to define what's 'white European'. I refer you to post WWII migration and the relaxation of the White Australia Policy, when someone had to DECIDE that southern and eastern Europeans could be white if they tried.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 02:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 02:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:19 am (UTC)The recognized races in the United States according to the Census Bureau seem to be "White" "Black or African American" "American Indian or Alaska Native" "Asian" "Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander" "Hispanic or Latino, Any Race" and "Some Other Race". Hispanics may be of any race, which really translates culturally into Black or White. (see here (http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/race/racefactcb.html)).
Italians and many people from the Middle East are definitely not "Black" or "American Indian" or "Pacific Islanders" or "Latinos". Some Middle Easterners might be classified as "Asian", others of them might be "Black" but in popular culture they're more likely to be viewed by default as White...ish. Russians and people from Eastern Europe are probably white by default even though many ethnic groups in Russia are probably closer to Asian.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:30 am (UTC)... I really don't like the idea of identifying ethnic groups by colour. It feels really really wrong.
Interesting that you'd say middle eastern groups are more likely to be viewed as "white-ish" - goes to show how different the cultural makeup of the US is to Australia's, I suppose. Here, middle eastern cultural groups tend to be the most feared / resented / considered least able to fit in / the group who most need to assimilate (rather than, say, integrate, or get along in a happy multicultural fashion).
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:35 am (UTC)... I have no idea what our census uses. Probably 'Anglo-Australian' or 'Of British or European descent'.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:38 am (UTC)white/Caucasian
Caucasian is our PC term for white when you just don't know what kind of white you are.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 04:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 12:13 pm (UTC)We need a descriptive term for "light skinned" that's short. Light skinned basically works, except that it's relative. "White" and "black" are loaded. But what are you, if you're of significantly mixed heritage? I'm a French/Irish/Italian/Austrian/Hungarian/Romanian-American. Yowza. I think (not completely sure) you can still call me a European American, but what about my cousins, who are Irish/French/Mexican-Americans? And African-American doesn't tell us enough, because African's huge and diverse all on its own.
This topic is too big for me, I think.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 02:47 am (UTC)I never know what term to identify people by, because most of them are icky and have all sorts of unpleasant connotations. But then no one has any idea what I'm talking about, because they're expecting to hear the usual descriptions. PoC does sound pretty old-fashioned and ... wrong - probably the only thing going for it is that it's reasonably wide-ranging, but even that's not necessarily a good thing, because hello generalisations.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 04:55 am (UTC)According to the data available from the Census Bureau, questions of religion are not reported on. I've never filled out a census questionnaire so I don't know if they're NOT ALLOWED TO but that data isn't available to the public even if they do gather it.
I do know that for government statistical reasons when I was applying to public universities I was not obligated to fill out my race (it was option) and the question of religion was not asked for records.
The offending link: Census Bureau categories. (http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ACSSAFFPeople?_event=&geo_id=01000US&_geoContext=01000US&_street=&_county=&_cityTown=&_state=&_zip=&_lang=en&_sse=on&ActiveGeoDiv=&_useEV=&pctxt=fph&pgsl=010&_submenuId=people_0&ds_name=ACS_2007_3YR_SAFF&_ci_nbr=null&qr_name=null®=null%3Anull&_keyword=&_industry=)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 04:04 am (UTC)Equally, "African-American" is fraught with all sorts of meanings. For example, Obama was criticized early on in his campaign for not being "black" enough because although his father was African, he didn't have the experience of slavery, although it could be argued that Obama in more "African-American" than most "African-Americans" who, because of their distance from their lineage, cannot pinpoint where their African heritage is located on a map.
So yes, a "person of color" is a PC term, but usually not one applied by a white person, but by members of that minority.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 05:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:36 am (UTC)I have never ever heard PoC used by anybody except 1) the internet and 2) old ladies trying hard to be PC. It always sounds sort of ... not good, to me. On the internet it seems to have a broader meaning, but in Virginia a Person of Color is black. Hispanic/Latino != PoC, PoC is a quaint term for a black human. I heard someone say that you can't say "black" in the USA, but ... that is what my black friends call themselves. Dunno. The newsfolk mostly say African American, which from my understanding causes problemos when referring to black Australians or English folks and such.
I have heard people arguing about what PoC really means, I have no idea. Italian-American = no, but if your skin is literally dark it seems to be okay. The exception seems to be that sometimes being Jewish makes you qualify as a PoC, but sometimes not. Highly awkward.
The War On Drugs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_drugs) (insanely long) is lame. I can't go into detail, it will take me all night, and I don't want to make myself sick.
The worst combination of things:
. racial profiling (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_profiling). (note: our relevant cop/coplike-agents are mostly white, and our poor+urban folks are disproportionately nonwhite)
. no-knock warrants (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-knock_warrant), just one of the many awful things to come out of the War On Drugs. This is terrible for every American. It shames me as a citizen.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:41 am (UTC)Oh, I'm glad someone else finds the term 'people of colour' uncomfortable. The term 'white' makes me screamingly uncomfortable, too - I guess I actually paid attention in history class, every time I hear 'white' I hear 'white Australia policy', government-endorsed discrimination, jingoism, cultural conservatism, and a whole bunch of things which can generally be summed up as DO NOT WANT. And I *am* technically (and literally, being as pale as a very pale thing) white, which is supposed to mean this sort of thing doesn't bother me.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:49 am (UTC)The problem is that it's so loaded, but we need a word to be descriptive. She was tall, with blue eyes and brown hair and white(can we use pink? We're pink.) skin. You don't know a body's history.
(I'm actually sorry to linkdump on you like that -- but I have to go to bed!)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 02:11 am (UTC)The war on drugs is just trying to get drug use and drug dealing gone bye-bye, I thought. And the assumption/fact-as-proven-by-"science" that lower class non-Anglo citizens are more likely to peddle or meddle in them than upper class Anglo citizens, with a continuum between. Then again, you have Proper Linkage now, so you'll probably be able to tell me how very wrong I am later.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 10:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 03:39 am (UTC)Under the banner of the War on Drugs, the government has been able to radically limit most civil liberties, and is in the process of militarizing the police. Corruption is endemic, although not yet on the scale of Mexico. The situation in Mexico is of course yet another bad consequence of the War on Drugs. What is more common is the tendency of police to abuse regular citizens for pleasure and/or profit.
I've heard the term "People of Color" used fairly often, usually with the intent of including non-whites under one term that distinguished them from whites. Whites in this context means those of European descent, and while it usually includes Jews, does not normally include anyone else of Mideastern descent. I think the intent behind the phrase is to be PC; at the very least, I've always heard it used by leftist or left-leaning sources, and never by conservative sources.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 07:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-27 10:01 am (UTC)Case in point: my dealer got herself busted in January (right before my loan day; the timing was abysmal). Every bedroom in her house was given over to growing weed. The amount she had, she could've been looking at fifteen years. Had she been black, she probably would have gone down for it. But she's white, and played the insanity card - "I'm bipolar, I self medicate." And it worked, once the police had been convinced that, yes, you can smoke an eighth a day. Dunno where things stand at the moment, but it looks like she won't be doing time for it.
And here, no, it's not "people of colour". It's black if they're black, or Asian if they're from anywhere near India, or Middle Eastern if they're from there.