Belated...
Nov. 4th, 2007 07:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Last month was Breast Cancer Awareness Month. Stephanie Trigg, who has over the last year or so blogged her own experiences with breast cancer and academia, wrote an opinion piece for the Melbourne Age on October 21st.
I should come clean and admit that I am a direct beneficiary of breast cancer research...
I expect some of the funding comes from pink sales and donations...
But this doesn't mean I can't be critical of the construction of femininity that characterises pink consumerism. It is not just in the colour — the pink of the Barbie aisle in a toy shop — that breast cancer promotions often infantilise women. It is the distinctive coding of the feminine as principally concerned with jewellery, clothes and cosmetics. What is on sale is the generalised clutter of the bedroom, often in the form of teddy bears and fluffy toys. It is a far cry from the womanly strength of the feminist purple of the 1970s. As Barbara Ehrenreich commented in a famous essay: "Certainly men diagnosed with prostate cancer do not receive gifts of Matchbox cars."
Most insidious, though, is the concept of "shopping for the cure", and the way it naturalises the idea of women as gleeful consumers of fashion and luxury items. There are lots of breast cancer promotions that don't depend on this idea, and many avenues for donating that assume that giving is its own reward. This is the case with many other health and wellbeing fund-raisers; we know Australians are generous. So why should breast cancer be so strongly associated with shopping?
Good questions. Go, read her article.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 08:08 am (UTC)Why must all women become children when they are diagnosed with a deadly illness?
...mind, I'd probably glee over a matchbox car if I were diagnosed with prostate cancer. I'd prefer some Transformers, mind. *is a nerd*
no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 08:10 am (UTC)how's that?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 08:12 am (UTC)Yay!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 12:44 pm (UTC)glad i'm not the only one to be pissed off by the marketing of the whole thing.
pink! ridiculous.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-04 12:49 pm (UTC)yup.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-05 11:01 am (UTC)I guess part of me just thinks; what the hell, go for it! Five cents from that strawberry Kit-Kat going to Breast Cancer research is five cents that wouldn't have otherwise gone their way, and the pink packet just lets you know where it's going.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 07:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 10:44 am (UTC)