Sex, puns, philology and geekiness. The best of the internet brought to you by Highlyeccentric.

[highlyeccentric]

Whopping great theory post which i must come back and finish reading at some point: Is there heterosexuality in the middle ages?
theory makes my brain hurt.
For what it's worth, my gut instinct is that jumping up and down and fussing around with modern sexual categories ends up with us missing some of the more foreign expressions of sexuality in the middle ages. Eroticism in the 12th century, for example, just isn't about copulation. It's about something else entirely, something which is very hard to grasp. Something which has Baudri of Bourgeuil writing Ovidian verse to everyone from Adela of Blois to the Duke of Normandy to the bishop to the little boys in the choir stall. Or, a little later, there's Hildegaard, who phrasemuffin's teacher tries to tell him is "lesbian for Mary". No. There's something else entirely going on and our framework for interpreting eroticism doesn't fit that at all.

Meanwhile, have an Anglo-Saxonist Pun

Bet you didn't know there was such as thing as feminist philology, did you? Deborah Cameron debunks the Mars & Venus myth. And by the looks of the Times article i just linked you to, she has her head screwed on straight. Whether you want to credit this to the fact that she's a feminist or the fact that she's a philologist, is entirely up to you.

Finally... Cecila is my hero.
I guess I'm not sure if my research is going to make a difference... Is it going to make the world a better place and improve the human condition? Probably not.
Then why do you do it?
Sheer geekiness, unfortunately. I just think this stuff is really cool.

Also, she offers a definition of "geek".

Comments

[daiskmeliadorn.livejournal.com]

sure does, that is going to be one mighty awesome rant :D

[highlyeccentric.livejournal.com]

i'm not sure how to put it... every way i phrase it ends up looking like i'm saying that homosexuality isn't important. or that gay people didn't exist. neither of which are true.

but i'll figure something out.

[daiskmeliadorn.livejournal.com]

*wanting to explode with conversation about this but feeling it might be good to wait until you actually write something first*

*and until i get around to reading the whole of that article*

i was really hoping to get into some of this kind of theory with my thesis, but so far i don't seem to be heading down a suitable path. not sure if that'sjust cos it's early stages in terms of writing or whether it's my supervisor's influence or what...

[highlyeccentric.livejournal.com]

converse away :) it might help me clarify my thoughts...

i'd be really interested to hear anything you had to say about the In The Middle post. i know the period but i don't get the Theory.