While hunting down the complete breakdown of results from California, I discovered that while Prop 8 has been passed, two measures relating to clean energy- Prop 10, for alternative fuel cars, and Prop 7, for renewable energy- have been knocked back. WTF, California?
Granted, I can't see from the brief description what *sort* of proposals they were, they might be godawful stupid propsoals, like Morris Iemma's desalination monstrosity. But still.
ETA: see Rymenhild's comment below. Apparently the proposals in question were foolish.
Speaking of Prop 8, how about we appoint the FRENCH Leaders of the Free World? They let you get a Pacte Civil de Solidarite with anyone, regardless of gender or relationship, with whom you live and share a partnership. You can pacser with your sibling or your mother or anyone at all, if you want them to be recognised as your Next of Kin and to benefit from your social security and so forth. No one gives a stuff who you sleep with: my French textbook had a happy profile of a middle-aged fellow who had got a PACS with his elderly mother when they were living together and both suffering from ill-health. The PACS is voided when one party marries, and/or by a statement on the part of the persons concerned.
According to my textbook, at least, the PACS isn't just a token measure, it's publicly recognised as a legitimate partnership; it's apparently popular with secular heterosexual couples; there are lines of 'PACS' cards and department stores have PACS gift registries. The French govt, as well as instituting the legal set-up for a civil union, went out of its way to advertise them as something attractive to everyone, not just gay couples.
Granted, I can't see from the brief description what *sort* of proposals they were, they might be godawful stupid propsoals, like Morris Iemma's desalination monstrosity. But still.
ETA: see Rymenhild's comment below. Apparently the proposals in question were foolish.
Speaking of Prop 8, how about we appoint the FRENCH Leaders of the Free World? They let you get a Pacte Civil de Solidarite with anyone, regardless of gender or relationship, with whom you live and share a partnership. You can pacser with your sibling or your mother or anyone at all, if you want them to be recognised as your Next of Kin and to benefit from your social security and so forth. No one gives a stuff who you sleep with: my French textbook had a happy profile of a middle-aged fellow who had got a PACS with his elderly mother when they were living together and both suffering from ill-health. The PACS is voided when one party marries, and/or by a statement on the part of the persons concerned.
According to my textbook, at least, the PACS isn't just a token measure, it's publicly recognised as a legitimate partnership; it's apparently popular with secular heterosexual couples; there are lines of 'PACS' cards and department stores have PACS gift registries. The French govt, as well as instituting the legal set-up for a civil union, went out of its way to advertise them as something attractive to everyone, not just gay couples.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:34 am (UTC)Prop 10 asks CA to borrow 5 billion dollars to use to research renewable energy cars. That's just too much money. The state of California is broke and can hardly pay the interest on the loans it's got now. I voted against it because I don't believe the state can afford it. I did vote for the state to borrow money to create a high speed train line between San Francisco and LA. That's a pro-environment measure, and it's also very necessary. Researching renewable energy cars... just isn't as good for the environment as getting a decent train system in, and we certainly can't support both.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:39 am (UTC)So who puts propositions on the ballot, then? I was assuming they were sort of like our referendums here, but evidently not...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:42 am (UTC)Seriously though, the PACS is pretty swish. Down with marriage. Up with PACS.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:55 am (UTC)you've been taking media too long. Go outside, take a deep breath, and then play video games or something.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 03:19 am (UTC)I thought it was a good idea when I was *in* the church. For one thing, parts of the UCA would happily issue a church marriage to gay couples, but can't, because of state law.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 03:24 am (UTC)I can't tell you how many times I've had ballot initiative petitions waved at me when I was living in Berkeley. I always refused to sign. Plenty of people around me just signed without bothering to read the petitions. It shuts the petition-wavers up, you see.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 03:35 am (UTC)All well and good, until it comes time to balance the budget... and the money doesn't balance. There must be drastic funding cuts. But it's in the law that California Elementary Schools *must* get x million dollars. So all the cuts go disproportionately to equally good causes that never got ballot initiatives to mandate their funding. Like, say, California higher education. Speaking as a graduate student at a California public university, I feel this system is more than a little bit unfair.
And I haven't even explained about the statutes that get stuck in state law even though they don't make an iota of sense...
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 03:36 am (UTC)Ok, you win, that sucks.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 09:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 10:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-06 01:27 pm (UTC)