thanks for commenting :) I'll get back to you about Kieckhefer as soon as i have this awful essay done. In short, though, i had problems with his definition of magic and i also thought, that having picked his definition he didn't stick to it. i also have problems with such broad general approaches.he talked about changes over time but didn't seem to apply that to his analysis.
other texts... depends what your interests are. if you have any interest in Anglo-Saxon at all, Bill Griffith's Aspects of Anglo-Saxon Magic is AWESOME. :D
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2007-11-08 05:59 am (UTC)thanks for commenting :) I'll get back to you about Kieckhefer as soon as i have this awful essay done. In short, though, i had problems with his definition of magic and i also thought, that having picked his definition he didn't stick to it.
i also have problems with such broad general approaches.he talked about changes over time but didn't seem to apply that to his analysis.
other texts... depends what your interests are. if you have any interest in Anglo-Saxon at all, Bill Griffith's Aspects of Anglo-Saxon Magic is AWESOME. :D