I'm sure I've rhapsodised about Early Manuscripts At Oxford University before, but let me just state again the absolute awesomeness of that collection. Assorted MSS from seven Oxford college libraries, available for free in digital facsimile form.
Meanwhile, News For Medievalists gives us the excellent news that Cambridge will soon be following suit, having teamed up with tech-heads from Stanford University to put 538 manuscripts from Parker Library, Corpus Christi College online. The collection ranges from the 6th to the 16th centuries and apparently includes one quarter of all surviving Old English manuscripts.
It won't be available for free, but will have to be subscribed to.1 So Oxford win Internet Brownies for putting theirs up for free; on the other hand, Cambridge are putting far more up. You win some, you lose some.
ed: I tell a lie. Awesome just sent me the link. The site is up in beta-release and subscription is free. She is thoroughly impressed with the quality of the resolutions and recommends the Red Book of Darley as 'exceptionally important'.
~
Speaking of Anglo-Saxonists and the internet, Jeff Sypeck of Quid Plura asserts that Compared to other medievalists, Anglo-Saxonists are numerous on the Web, but then they’ve long been a forward-looking bunch. Now, this description of our noble discipline quite surprised me. I'm rather more used to Awesome's summary, which went something like this: "Now, Medieval Studies is an inherantly conservative discipline, and Anglo-Saxonists are the most conservative of the lot". Still, apparently Anglo-Saxonism has a respectable history on the internet, and Jeff offers some suggestions as to how that came to be.
Some things he didn't mention, however, are that Beowulf has now established itself at the point in the public concious where it becomes a LOLCAT joke, or that there is an Anglo-Saxon language Wikipedia.
Not only are Anglo-Saxonists putting the Internet to use in their best interests... the Internet is putting Anglo-Saxon to use in its own interests (which are, patently, the creation of memes and obscure jokes).
Meanwhile, News For Medievalists gives us the excellent news that Cambridge will soon be following suit, having teamed up with tech-heads from Stanford University to put 538 manuscripts from Parker Library, Corpus Christi College online. The collection ranges from the 6th to the 16th centuries and apparently includes one quarter of all surviving Old English manuscripts.
It won't be available for free, but will have to be subscribed to.1 So Oxford win Internet Brownies for putting theirs up for free; on the other hand, Cambridge are putting far more up. You win some, you lose some.
ed: I tell a lie. Awesome just sent me the link. The site is up in beta-release and subscription is free. She is thoroughly impressed with the quality of the resolutions and recommends the Red Book of Darley as 'exceptionally important'.
~
Speaking of Anglo-Saxonists and the internet, Jeff Sypeck of Quid Plura asserts that Compared to other medievalists, Anglo-Saxonists are numerous on the Web, but then they’ve long been a forward-looking bunch. Now, this description of our noble discipline quite surprised me. I'm rather more used to Awesome's summary, which went something like this: "Now, Medieval Studies is an inherantly conservative discipline, and Anglo-Saxonists are the most conservative of the lot". Still, apparently Anglo-Saxonism has a respectable history on the internet, and Jeff offers some suggestions as to how that came to be.
Some things he didn't mention, however, are that Beowulf has now established itself at the point in the public concious where it becomes a LOLCAT joke, or that there is an Anglo-Saxon language Wikipedia.
Not only are Anglo-Saxonists putting the Internet to use in their best interests... the Internet is putting Anglo-Saxon to use in its own interests (which are, patently, the creation of memes and obscure jokes).