highlyeccentric (
highlyeccentric) wrote2010-06-08 09:27 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This is a quote i have to share:
Although pumpkin is readily available in many countries, Australia is the only one to consider it seriously as a vegetable.
- The Women's Weekly Cookbook, 1970-something.
We not only consider our pumpkins, we consider them *seriously*. Not like the Americans, who clearly take their pumpkins lightly, appropriating them as a source of festivity and jokes.
And just in case you thought we might consider pumpkins as meat, starch, dessert, or even furniture, let us make it clear: we consider pumpkin seriously as a vegetable. Pumpkins in this country are secure and widely affirmed in their identity as vegetables!
Pumpkin: SRS BIZNIS FOODSTUFFS
no subject
AWESOME. I for one am always in favour of foods choosing to adopt the food-genre-category that they feel best fits them, regardless of what they are 'supposed to' do. For example, zucchini bread. Beetroot cake (yes, really).
no subject
I hear that, in the past, pumpkins were even consigned to dog food in Germany! Discrimination is rife.
no subject
no subject
no subject