Er, I said it was an example, which sort of implies that it wasn't an absolute statement. As it happens, I do think it is wrong-headed, but I was not trying to make a case for that in this instance. It is far too long to bring up in a comment thread; when I make my case for that, it will be on a post of its own right.

I do make broad generalisations and then back away from them! Because in my haste I often type something that is broader than I intend. So when called on it, I always clarify my point. I would have thought that would be a good thing, and always expect it from others.

[T]heir belief, if they do believe it (and yes it is certainly possible that they do), IS reprehensible. we all agree on that.

So, uh, what are you disagreeing with? Was I not clear enough in my initial post that that was what I was saying?

I haven't fallen back on 'all religion' is bad yet; I am trying to make what would be one part of that argument here. That this kind of religious belief is bad. It seems self-evidently bad to you or I, but plenty of folk believe it.

As for Hobson, I always give people the credit that they believe what they say they do. I'll push them on it, but I'll believe their answers as being genuine. It seems to be the only fair thing to do.